Navigation X
ALERT
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!

cracked.io | Best Forum Around | Free Premium Accounts




 311

Why did so many pioneers of certain subgenres didn't like to be associated with it?

by a1lled11 - 09 April, 2024 - 01:36 PM
This post is by a banned member (a1lled11) - Unhide
a1lled11  
Registered
2
Posts
1
Threads
#1
Robert Fripp of King Crimson was suspicious of the term prog rock.

Portishead didn't like the term trip hop.

Low didn't like their music to be branded as slowcore.

And even a band like Cypress Hill avoided to be branded as latin hip hop to be not too niche for their genre.

I'm sure there are many more examples. What do you make of this? Shouldn't these folks to be proud to have found a good niche? Or did they feel it was too limiting to their music
This post is by a banned member (XRumerTest) - Unhide
8
Posts
3
Threads
4 Years of service
#2
Hello. And Bye.
This post is by a banned member (a1lled11) - Unhide
a1lled11  
Registered
2
Posts
1
Threads
#3
(09 April, 2024 - 01:36 PM)a1lled11 Wrote: Show More
Robert Fripp of King Crimson was suspicious of the term prog rock.

Portishead didn't like the term trip hop.

Low didn't like their music to be branded as slowcore.

And even a band like Cypress Hill avoided to be branded as latin hip hop to be not too niche for their genre.
<!--td {border: 1px solid #cccccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->https://omegle.onl/ vshare
I'm sure there are many more examples. What do you make of this? Shouldn't these folks to be proud to have found a good niche? Or did they feel it was too limiting to their music

I got this,...

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
or
Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)