Bring back Usergroup requesting section

[1.823]

Apart from the requirements in order to obtain a requirement based usergroup , user needs to post a thread clarifying in it why he does deserve this rank .

I want to emphasize this since people are spamming literally anything ( Fake hits , irrelevant leaks and reposts ) .

I suggest bringing back this section in which a staff member must manually verify whether likes are boosted or not , high quality threads or just a constant spam .

And by this occasion , i would like to suggest a slight increase in the requirements in order to get a requirement based usergroup .

Quality over quantity .

Where am I?

 

[108]

Apart from the requirements in order to obtain a requirement based usergroup , user needs to post a thread clarifying in it why he does deserve this rank .

I want to emphasize this since people are spamming literally anything ( Fake hits , irrelevant leaks and reposts ) .

I suggest bringing back this section in which a staff member must manually verify whether likes are boosted or not , high quality threads or just a constant spam .

And by this occasion , i would like to suggest a slight increase in the requirements in order to get a requirement based usergroup .

Quality over quantity .

BIG +++++

no telegram no discord

[1.097]

Sir there as a time you copy pasted my own private mail access list and reposted it in the same day. No point trying to dictate others when you're guilty of the same LQ spam posting for linear progressive fake sense of validation 

Where am I? 

[16.799]

It should be applicable for all then you , me and other usergroups too... We all should fall in same checking thing..

Paid Ad , I dont own it

---

Paid Ad , I dont own it

[16]

Yes needs to be applicable for all to make it fair.